top of page


Updated: Mar 1, 2021

Nazism, COVID-19 and the destruction of modern medicine: An interview with Vera Sharav, Part Two

Vera Sharav

July 24, 2015

A public advocate for human rights is the founder and president of the Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) which serves as an information resource and public interest watchdog organization whose goal is to unlock the walls of secrecy in biomedical research and bring accountability to that endeavor. AHRP Infomails have a wide following: they are read by physicians and scientists, public health officials, journalists, lawyers, and patient advocacy organizations.


Stand for Health Freedom video 1 Nazism, COVID-19 and the destruction of modern medicine: An interview with Vera Sharav, Part One

Stand for Health Freedom recently had the honor of sitting down with Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav and capturing her personal story on film. It’s a story that every individual needs to hear. A renowned champion of human rights and expert in biomedical research ethics, Ms. Sharav offers rare and valuable insights into the public health arena and state of emergency affecting each and every one of our lives. She also draws parallels between what happened in Nazi Germany and what’s happening in our society today — and discusses why it’s more important than ever for us to take a stand. Check out Part 2 of the interview here:​ Visit to learn more about Vera's work.​ Note: In the video, Ms. Sharav said that babies receive tetanus shots. She meant to say that newborns receive the Hepatitis B vaccine; DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) is administered two months later. STAND UP: Share this interview with your family, friends and peers. Then sign the petition linked below to say no to forced one-size-fits-all medicine:

video 2


What happens when people indiscriminately follow government orders? What about when those orders are for the greater good but they might hurt the individual? Join us for a must-see conversation with Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav as she speaks out on public health policy today and the government’s response to coronavirus. You don’t want to miss this important discussion with one of the most acclaimed human rights champions of our time! For more information on Vera Sharav and the Alliance for Human Research Protection, visit In case you missed Part One of this interview, you can find it here:​ Sign this important petition to make it clear that Americans won’t stand for a forced coronavirus vaccine; informed consent is non-negotiable and a basic human right:​ Join​ to receive alerts to take a stand. Then follow us on Facebook and Instagram @standforhealthfreedom and on Twitter @standforhealth1. Support our efforts to safeguard basic human rights, constitutional rights and parental rights:​.


What's happening is clearly a breach of Common law and basic human rights.


The time has come when we need to unite and beat them at their own game. This time is NOW.


Join the movement today -


"IMPORTANT!!!!!!!I must watch....


Yesterday afternoon we received confirmation that the partners of the firm of barristers we are talking to about the case against Parliament are all in agreement - the case is one that can be won, despite the hurdles that we will have to get over to achieve that.

This means that we are now moving forward into the preparation of the court papers, including an affidavit containing all of the allegations of fraud, treason and genocide.

It will be the first time allegations of treason have been made since the aftermath of WWII, whilst genocide is a crime under international law and the such allegations would almost certainly be dealt with in the Hague.

Nevertheless, with Liverpool and Northern Ireland already under regional lockdown diktats , as well as Newcastle and London having been threatened with the same, along with the rest of Britain [save for the more affluent areas], we are aiming to lay the charges in a criminal court as soon as they have been properly drafted.

We will also be seeking an order placing the entire cabinet and their advisers under house arrest, to prevent the rogue government from attempting to murder more people [as well as its opponents, under the new homicide enabling act] with purported statutory impunity.

Here's a conversation I had with Mark Devlin this week on that very subject and much more. Please listen and share fare and wide.

Find all Mark Devlin's work here:

All Right Reserved under Magna Carta 2020 and the Treaty of Universal Community Trust

Subscribe to The Bernician's blog:

#PrivateCriminalProsecutions #PandemicFraud


Whistleblower from Berlin old people's home: The terrible death after vaccination

TRANSLATED FROM German to English

video on website link

For the first time there is an eyewitness report from a Berlin old people's home on the situation after the vaccination. It comes from the AGAPLESION Bethanien Havelgarten retirement home in Berlin-Spandau. There, within four weeks of the first vaccination with the BioNTech / Pfizer vaccine preparation Comirnaty, eight of 31 seniors who suffered from dementia but were in good physical condition for their age prior to the vaccination died. The first death occurred after just six days, five other seniors died around 14 days after the vaccination. The first symptoms of the disease appeared shortly after the vaccination. According to the information available to date on, the absolutely necessary adequate education about the risks of this vaccine was insufficient - among other things Viviane Fischer, attorney and Dr. Reiner Füllmich from the Corona Committee spoke in a video interview with the whistleblower about the details of the vaccination, the symptoms that occurred and the difference in dying in relation to the vaccination. On January 3, 2021, 31 residents of the dementia ward “ground floor / protected area” had been vaccinated with Comirnaty. The relatives of another three seniors objected to the vaccination, two residents were in terminal care, which is why vaccination was not required. The residents of this station are very active, “defensive” dementia who are physically in good condition. You can move around the ward without restriction all day. The day before the vaccination, the 31 vaccinated people were all healthy. A few days earlier, according to the whistleblower report, all had tested negative for Corona. The first vaccination with Comirnaty on January 3, 2021, according to the whistleblower, took place in such a way that all residents were gathered in the common room on the ground floor. A vaccination team consisting of an elderly vaccinator, three auxiliaries and two Bundeswehr soldiers in Flecktarn uniform carried out the vaccinations. The home workers and the home doctor supported the process. The role of the Bundeswehr soldiers who never moved away from the vaccine has not been conclusively clarified. What the whistleblower was able to determine, however, was that the presence of the uniformed officers greatly intimidated the seniors. The group, which normally shows a “strong defensive behavior” in unfamiliar treatments, was hardly recognizable because it was so predominantly “lamb-pious” that they endured the vaccination with Comirnaty. The whistleblower suspects that this could also be related to the fact that the very old senior citizens who had still witnessed the war were unable to properly assess the role of soldiers and were possibly reminded of war-traumatic circumstances. During the first vaccination, a refusing senior citizen was held by a nurse under the watchful eyes of the Bundeswehr soldiers, the eyewitness reports. There was no judicial ruling for detention, which as such constitutes a compulsion and therefore generally requires a judicial assessment in individual cases. According to the whistleblower, the second dose of vaccination was given without warning where the person to be vaccinated was found. For example, an old lady lying unsuspectingly in bed who began to fight back against the second dose was detained by two nurses to overcome her resistance - again without the necessary judicial order. According to the whistleblower, scraping for the PCR test, which some seniors tried to oppose, is regularly done with the use of physical strength against the elderly who resist unwanted removal. According to the information of the whistleblower, the carers and relatives were informed about the vaccination - the seniors are not able to give effective vaccination consent due to their dementia restriction - on the basis of outdated information sheets from the RKI / Green Dot. There, in particular, the information required in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 507/2006 on the EU approval (Conditional Marketing Authorization) granted to the vaccine Comirnaty and on the important reasons for the conditional approval (in particular the View of the licensing authority EMA with regard to various aspects of the data situation to be improved, e.g. with regard to the interaction of Comirnaty with other drugs). Already on the day of the vaccination, four of the vaccinated seniors began to show unusual symptoms. In the evening of that day they were exhausted and extremely tired, sometimes they fell asleep at the table over dinner. A sharp drop in oxygen saturation was found in the blood. In the further course the leaden tiredness continued, the oxygen saturation in the blood remained insufficient, sometimes gasping for breath occurred and there was fever, edema, skin rash, a yellowish-gray discoloration of the skin and the (characteristic) muscle tremors on the upper body and arms. The seniors also showed a change in character, were sometimes unresponsive and refused to eat and drink. A vaccinated elderly woman who was previously “fit” according to her age and did not suffer from any serious pre-existing illnesses died on January 9, 2021, just six days after the vaccination. The deaths of the vaccinated seniors occurred on January 15, January 16, January 19 (2 deaths), January 20, February 2 and February 8, 2021. The most recently deceased senior was a former opera singer who performed on Had played the piano the day before the vaccination. The whistleblower reports on the state of health that the old man regularly jogged, danced, made music and was otherwise very dynamic and active. Of the seniors who tested negative before the vaccination, several suddenly showed a positive test result after the vaccination. However, none of these seniors showed any of the known COVID-19 symptoms, i.e. symptoms of a common cold such as cough, runny nose, loss of smell and taste, etc. On January 24, 2021, the second dose of Comirnaty was administered to 21 seniors. After this vaccination, according to the whistleblower, eleven seniors show persistent extreme tiredness, sometimes gasping, sometimes edema, skin rash and the yellowish-grayish skin discoloration. As of February 10, 2021, the senior citizen who received the second dose of Comirnaty has died, but the state of health of some of the senior citizens from this group is continuously deteriorating. The whistleblower impressively describes the different nature of the dying process of the vaccinated. Ordinarily, at some point the dying would accept their imminent death and - perhaps after seeing a loved one for the last time - go in peace. The death like after the vaccination was different. It was "inhuman". The old people were breathing heavily, trembling badly, and were inwardly as if stepped away. It seemed to him like a lonely, futile struggle against death, as if “people knew that their time had not yet come, and therefore they could not have let go yet”. The AGAPLESION Bethanien Havelgarten retirement home was requested on February 3, 2021 by lawyer Viviane Fischer, on behalf of and on behalf of two journalists investigating the subject, to comment on the events, but has not responded to this day. Attorney Viviane Fischer filed a criminal complaint with the public prosecutor on February 3, 2021, 12:04 p.m., and the police and Prof. Klaus Cichutek , the head of the Paul Ehrlich Institute responsible for recording side effects of vaccination , and the Berlin Senator for Health, Dilek Kalayci , informed about the events. The health department was also informed, as was the department of the Senate Administration responsible for care. Attorney Fischer asked the public prosecutor to secure the corpse of the last deceased old gentleman and pointed out the feared death of the then emerging eighth victim who has since died of his illness. In response to a telephone inquiry on February 8, 2021, the process could not be found in the registry of the public prosecutor's office. Such a recording, it was announced, could take up to six weeks in Corona times. Attorney Fischer therefore also filed a criminal complaint via the police's internet station on February 8, 2021. On the evening of February 9, 2021, the police issued a press inquiry with a view to investigations initiated, the seizure of the bodies and possible similar past incidents investigated by the authorities, which lawyer Fischer in turn made on behalf of the two journalists on February 8, 2021 answered as follows: “So far the Berlin police have not conducted any investigations in connection with the deaths you have described. Such investigations are always initiated if a doctor certifies an unnatural cause of death when issuing the death certificate. The Berlin police are also not aware of the two deaths you mentioned. In this respect, no investigations were carried out or the body of the deceased was secured. The criminal charges you have filed have been submitted to the Berlin Police and are currently being examined by a specialist commissioner of the criminal police or the Berlin public prosecutor's office. Information on this can be obtained from the Berlin public prosecutor's office. ” The investigative behavior of the police, which currently appears to be little committed, is in contrast to the principle of legality and compulsory prosecution for criminal offenses, according to lawyer Dr. Fill me. A violation of this could justify the accusation of obstruction of punishment in the office according to § 258 a StGB. Section 160 (I) sentence of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates: “As soon as the public prosecutor's office becomes aware of the suspicion of a criminal offense through a report or by other means, it has to investigate the facts of the matter in order to decide whether the public charge is to be brought”. Section 160 (I) sentence 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies: “The authorities and officers of the police service must investigate criminal offenses and take all orders that do not allow delay in order to prevent the matter from being darkened.” It would therefore contradict current law that the police might only take action if the general practitioner or emergency doctor filling out the death certificate, or even the vaccinator himself, confirmed an unnatural cause of death. It is already questionable whether an external doctor, who in case of doubt cannot know the patient's history in detail, is even able to correctly assess the situation and the death rate. According to the circumstances described here, according to lawyer Dr. Fuellmich, undoubtedly the considerable initial suspicion that the extraordinary frequency of deaths - in the department usually only one or two senior citizens die a month - was not due to natural causes. With regard to the eleven seniors whose health deteriorated after the second dose of Comirnaty, there is also danger in arrears. The police, the health authorities and the senate administration have a guarantor position to avert danger for the population. If the persons appointed to avert danger do not fulfill their obligation, the persons involved may be punished for active aiding or abetting by failure to cause bodily harm (possibly resulting in death) - in office, according to lawyer Fischer. If necessary, negligent involvement must also be examined. The police are therefore obliged to initiate professional investigations immediately, also for reasons of hazard protection for possible future victims. Autopsy is mandatory. A withdrawal on a possible theoretical assessment by police experts, as indicated to the lawyer Fischer by the responsible department LKA 115 (crimes against humans), could not be accepted. For the question of which symptoms arise after a vaccination and could possibly lead to death, there is currently no expertise at all, if only because there are currently no reliable study results, e.g. with regard to the risk to old people from the vaccine and, in particular, no interaction studies other drugs were present. After deaths in Norway following the corona vaccination, the vaccination of very old, fragile people is becoming more common There could be no expertise at the moment, if only because there are currently no reliable study results, for example with regard to the risk to old people from the vaccine and, in particular, no interaction studies with other drugs. After deaths in Norway following the corona vaccination, the vaccination of very old, fragile people is becoming more common There could be no expertise at the moment, if only because there are currently no reliable study results, for example with regard to the risk to old people from the vaccine and, in particular, no interaction studies with other drugs. After deaths in Norway following the corona vaccination, the vaccination of very old, fragile people is becoming more commonNo longer recommended in Norway . Because of the imposing causal relationships between vaccination and the accumulation of deaths, especially among older people, state measures are urgently required to protect the health and life of all people who are ready to be vaccinated and those who have already received a dose of Comirnaty. This may include the suspension of the use of this vaccine for the duration of a full and transparent investigation into any role it may have played in the death of the elderly whose fates are the subject of this article. These state measures are to be taken in particular for the benefit of those people who want to visit vaccination centers, are residents of old people's or nursing homes or work in the health care system with contact to patients. Comirnaty does not appear to be as certain as one might think, given the government's vaccination campaign and the many public statements from politicians and experts who support the government's lockdown course. Comirnaty is a so-called mRNA vaccine (mRNA = messenger ribonucleic acid). The mRNA contains the “blueprint” for a protein on the surface of SARS-CoV-2. Through the vaccination, this blueprint reaches the body cells of the vaccinated person via tiny fat particles (fat nanobodies). These should then produce a protein that can be found on the surface of the virus. This in turn is intended to induce the immune system to react, which is intended to ensure that an appropriate immune response can occur in the event of a later infection with SARS-CoV-2. Because of the unusually short duration of the clinical trials on humans, it is obvious from's point of view that not all possible negative effects of this vaccine could be researched. From the point of view of experts, there is a particular risk of the formation of infection-enhancing antibodies (antibody dependent enhancement, ADE). This is the name given to antibodies that bind to the surface of viruses, but do not neutralize them, but instead lead to an improved uptake of the virus into a cell and thus promote the spread and reproduction of the virus. Infection-enhancing antibodies promote immune pathogenesis and are a long-known potential hazard from certain vaccines. The occurrence of this risk is well documented for earlier, unsuccessful attempts at developing vaccines against coronaviruses (such as SARS-CoV). In some preclinical animal experiments, the animals became seriously ill or even died after encountering the wild virus due to the appearance of antibodies that intensify the infection. Experts also fear that the occurrence of autoimmune diseases and impairment or endangerment of fertility, pregnancy, unborn life, breastfeeding with breast milk and the children whose mothers were vaccinated during pregnancy cannot be ruled out - especially because the The likelihood of these negative consequences occurring due to the design of the human clinical trials, which BioNTech / Pfizer carried out prior to Comirnaty's conditional approval, could not be investigated or not adequately investigated. According to the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the polyethylene glycol (PEG) -containing lipid nanoparticles contained therein are also possible triggers of serious reactions observed in connection with the vaccination with Comirnaty. This is also worrying because numerous preclinical studies have shown that PEG liposomes are suitable for transporting substances across the blood-brain barrier. In animal studies, certain liposomes have also been linked to the death of specific cells in the liver and lungs. For more information, see the recording of meeting No. 37 of the Corona Committee (from 03:55:00). According to the EMA dashboard , 54,828 unwanted vaccine reactions had already been reported as of February 12, 2021. On January 31, 2021 , there were 26,849 . Because of the multiple concerns about the vaccination, a withdrawal request has already been madeagainst approval by the EMA. According to attorney Fischer, attorney Dr. Renate Holzeisen, for clients based in Italy, submit a complaint against this admission along with an urgent procedure to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on time Such a lawsuit and such an application are possible within a period of two months after the granted conditional approval by Cominarty. These proceedings would now also be accompanied by an international network of lawyers and scientists, which also included the members of the Corona Committee. The judgment in the main proceedings and the decision in the urgent proceedings will have an impact in all EU member states for which the conditional approval of Comirnaty takes effect. On February 12, 2021, the public prosecutor Viviane Fischer announced in writing: “Your criminal complaint is already known here, but not yet recorded in our system, so I cannot provide you with any further information at the moment. However, within the framework of the permissible investigations, everything that is necessary will be prompted with the necessary acceleration. " 2020News will report on the further development.

Preliminary result

According to the current state of knowledge, there is a lot to suggest that the risk emanating from SARSCoV-2 was greatly overestimated, but that the risks and damage caused by the measures were not sufficiently taken into account. The government did as early as April

2020 states that it has not and has not carried out an impact assessment

plans. In a case led by the lawyer Jessica Hamed before the Bavarian Administrative Court, the Bavarian State Chancellery let it be known that it was up

to the present day - in violation of the rule of law, according to which everything is state

Actions must be verifiable - no documents, no written expert reports on impact assessment. This is to be regarded as at least grossly negligent, especially in view of the increasing numbers of reports of lockdown damage to companies, children, the elderly, etc.

The risk assessment shows that a manageable risk (flu-like virus

without risk potential for the health system as a whole) with a high risk

Package of measures has been combated. The lockdown and action risks have

is already being realized to an extreme extent. They did not produce the hoped-for effects, as the infections and the positive test results, as shown at least in retrospect by evaluating the occurrence of death, were already declining at the time the lockdown was imposed. Since the end of June 2020

the positive test results are now in the range of the false-positive background noise of the

Move tests. Due to the ongoing measures (masks, distance requirement and

Related sales losses, closure of concert halls, etc.) are realizing further major damage to the economy, health, cultural and social issues every day

Life of the people in Germany. Harm and benefit are out of proportion. In order to

the encroachments on fundamental rights appear to be disproportionate and consequently unlawful.

The governments have not carried out a sufficient, accompanying weighing of interests, as was explicitly imposed on them by the highest court, on the contrary, they did

consciously refrained from observing the collateral damage. The

Let governments hold guilty action

Reiner Fuellmich, discussing whistleblower info re the Covax rollout. No location information, but disturbingly, out of the 31 Aged Care Recipients, 8 died after 2 weeks and 11 had serious side effects. These numbers are mind-bending.




The Corona Committee was founded in July 2020 by the lawyers Antonia Fischer and Viviane Fischer and the lawyers Dr. Reiner Füllmich and Dr. Justus

Hoffmann put on. He is looking for answers to legal questions as to whether the anti-corona measures of the federal and state governments are against a possible overload of the

Health system ("flatten the curve") and to prevent SARS-CoV2 deaths -

according to the constitutional test criteria - were suitable, necessary and proportionate or whether the collateral damage that occurred was culpably caused

have been. For this purpose, between July 14, 2020 and August 21, 2020, a total of 13

Meetings of experts and witnesses asked about the matter. This short report

provides an overview of the most important findings of the meetings. A long version is in progress, further meetings will follow.

Everything stands still - the high phase of the lockdown

In January 2020, it became apparent that a coronavirus of

China would spread to Germany. At the beginning of March 2020, the media showed frightening images of illness and death in Italy: overcrowded hospitals, coffins, military on emergency duty. The federal and state governments decided on March 22nd

To impose a lockdown on Germany in 2020, which includes the several months

Closure of kindergartens, playgrounds, schools, universities, theaters, concert halls, cinemas, restaurants and all shops that are not in the immediate vicinity

Basic supplies for the population were included. Meetings were forbidden, hygiene regulations were stipulated and social contacts were restricted (no visits to old people's homes and hospitals, distance requirements, etc.). In the meantime it is

to relaxation in many areas - opening of schools, restaurants, shops etc. -

come, in other areas regulations have tightened - e.g. mask obligation in some cases with fines.

The measures affected and in some cases still affect fundamental rights

of the population. Freedom of expression is particularly affected (Art. 5 Para. 1 S. 1

GG), religious freedom (Art. 4 Para. 1 and 2 GG), freedom of art (Art. 5 Para. 3 GG),

the freedom of science, research and teaching (Article 5 (3) of the Basic Law), the freedom to choose and pursue a profession (Article 12 (1) of the Basic Law), the freedom of assembly (Article 8 (1)

GG), the right to property (Art. 14 GG), specifically the right to an established and exercised commercial enterprise, freedom of movement and the freedom to choose one's place of residence (Art. 2, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2), the right to education (Art AEMR), freedom of operation

of the political parties (Art. 21 GG), the right to free development of the personality as

Part of the general freedom of action (Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law).

In the public discussion it seems as if the equation Corona-positive = applies

infected = contagious = sick = doomed, so that seemingly must be weighed up

has to be between potential deaths and restrictions on freedom, in short: the grandmother's life against renouncing singing in the karaoke bar. It's clear,

that the legal good life so apparently justifies every intervention.

However, the emotional equation Corona-positive = doomed to die is incorrect from the start in view of the extremely low death rate with SARS-CoV-2. The measures

therefore never aimed, according to government statements, at averting a certain disaster, but only at risking the population through a possible

To ward off overloading of the health system or the spread of

To counteract SARS-CoV-2.

The constitutionally compliant, legally relevant question is therefore: Does the relationship between reducing the risk of contracting Covid-19 agree and, if applicable, agree?

die, and the (realized) risk that the defense measures will have negative effects. Ultimately, it is about weighing up life risks. Only if that

If the remedy is no more harmful than the disease, a measure may be justified.

Especially in the case of massive restrictions on freedom, the state is obliged to continue

to check whether these are imperative to avert danger, whether there are milder means

and / or the collateral damage outweighs e.g. health protection. Of the

The state must constantly be actively involved in gaining knowledge (e.g. with regard to danger

of the virus, increase in lockdown victims) strive to keep the encroachments on fundamental rights

to reduce it to the absolutely necessary minimum

It quickly became clear that the fears that SARS-CoV-2 could be significantly more dangerous in terms of communicability, disease burden and mortality than one

Influenza, proven inapplicable. In the meantime, there are a large number of these

of studies carried out. As early as April 2020, the Italian health department announced that the average age of the deceased was 83 years and so good

how nobody died without previous illnesses. Sometimes the dead had up to three,

some serious previous illnesses, especially in the heart-lung area. In Germany, too, this year's flu season shows neither in the outpatient nor in the inpatient sector

exceptional morbidity or mortality data. It is only noticeable that one

temporary excess mortality became apparent in the first few weeks of lockdown. All in all, medical practices and clinics were used far less

Even the funeral directors didn't have as much to do this year as in, for example


For comparison: According to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the 2017/18 flu wave in Germany led to an excess mortality rate of 25,100 victims from all age groups despite the vaccine. In 2018 there were also almost 30,000 deaths, including 3,000 road traffic victims. In Germany, around around 8,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospital

15,000 people.

The symptoms of Covid-19 correspond to those of flu, other phenomena such as

E.g. that of the Hamburg pathologist Prof. Klaus Püschel in the context of against the

Recommendation of the RKI performed autopsies have observed microthromboses

has not yet proven to be an original SARS-CoV-2 symptom. They are the result of an excessive or incorrectly controlled immune reaction and are also known as complications from other viral diseases. After research by the pulmonologist and epidemiologist Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, due to the lack of autopsies in immobilized influenza patients (e.g. in old people's homes), for whom a similar finding could be expected, there are no current comparative studies. For the flu year 1969/70, however, O. Haferkamp described similar effects for flu deaths. The assumption that SARS-CoV-2 would cause symptoms like those in Kawasaki syndrome has not yet been confirmed.

According to the former head physician Dr. Gerd Reuther shouldn't be for

the treatment of Covid-19 approved medications cause many "Covid deaths"

According to the results of the so-called Heinsberg study of the

Virologist Prof. Hendrik Streeck hardly suggests. Transmission via aerosols seems to be proven

however, not with the suspected, highly aggressive distribution dynamic. The former head of the health department, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg reports that studies have shown

that children are generally hardly a source of epidemic hygiene, because a protective one quickly develops in their environment regularly and without serious disease processes

Develop herd immunity.

International publications show that approx. 5 to 15% of respiratory diseases are caused or partly caused by cold coronaviruses. Dr. wolfgang

Wodarg also points out that it has long been known to be viral in respiratory

Respiratory diseases very often (up to approx. 50%) due to two or even more together

or virus types occurring in direct succession. With regard

Flu vaccination is the scientifically proven phenomenon that the flu vaccination

while minimizing the risk of getting influenza. However, those vaccinated against the flu suffered

just as often from respiratory diseases as the unvaccinated. The place in the dance

the virus that the flu vaccination has cleared will be from one immediately

other pathogens, e.g. rhinovirus or coronavirus, according to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg. It is noticeable that officially there are hardly any flu deaths in 2020 - compared to

an average of 8,000 flu deaths and even 25,100 deaths in the extreme year 2017/2018.

This is probably due to a so-called attention bias, a particularly concentrated one

and in the present case even financially supported observation of great misleading importance.

What role SARS-CoV-2 in the context of respiratory diseases

plays, has remained unclear according to the current state of investigation in the committee. There was excess mortality in Germany in the first half of 2020 according to a corresponding

Special evaluation by the Federal Statistical Office cannot be determined. In Germany

An average of 2,500 to 3,000 people die every day. If the number of people whose death is attributed to Covid-19 is allocated to the previous months, around 50 people per day died in connection with Corona within six months. Without a test, Covid-19 might not have been noticed as an independent disease process. The Covid-19 sick and dead would likely be as

Victim of a flu, a rhinovirus or one of the already known coronaviruses

triggered respiratory tract infection was (incorrectly) recorded

link to 28 page report if you would like to continue - I used google translate


DrScottJensen on Vax


Paul Murray Live 15-2-2021

Yesterday I appeared on Paul Murray Live to discuss the current lockdown and the State of Emergency extension bill


Tim Smith MP - Member for Kew

speech in Parliament today, unequivically opposing Daniel Andrews outrageous plan to extend Victoria’s State of Emergency to December.


David Limbrick MP - Liberal Democrats

Question to AG on 5 day lockdown.

Today I asked the Attorney General to provide some assurances that the recent 5 day lockdown was both proportionate and the least restrictive of rights, as required by the Public Health and Wellbeing Act. I also asked about what the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission was doing to protect human rights during the 5 day lockdown.


When real people stand up for their freedom and rights ....

We are proud to have such good folks come visit us and support from New York and Tennessee! God Bless!


Premier Andrews GRILLED on Lockdown, Quarantine, and Contact Tracing

“If you’re so confident in your hotel quarantine program and your team — why do you need a lockdown for such a small number of cases for a population of

Premier Andrews was grilled by veteran ABC journalist Leigh Sales at today’s daily briefing.

Mr Andrews had declined an interview with Sales, who then used the press conference to confront the Premier over his “circuit breaker” lockdown and lack of confidence in Victoria’s failed quarantine and contact tracing systems.


Hotel quarantine workers focus of Victoria’s initial COVID-19 vaccine rollout

The first doses landed in Australia on Monday ahead of a vaccination rollout beginning on February 22.


Bill Gates - What you were not told "In simple terms. Bill Gates is a silent and cunning killer. His philantrophies is a snare. A trap to capture and control his prey. But his days are numbered"




National Security Study Memorandum

Declassified/Released on 7/3/89 under provisions of E.O. 12356 by F. Graboske, National Security Council

Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide

(Joseph Brewda) On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post-Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.

The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.” The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.”

NSSM 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. It paid special attention to 13 “key countries” in which the United States had a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.CONTINUE HERE “It is questionable,” Kissinger gloated, “whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis.” Consequently, “large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades—a kind the world thought had been permanently banished,” was foreseeable—famine, which has indeed come to pass


CONTENT thanks toy Barry

Richard Rothschild had the patent in 2015, surely these giant Pharma Companies which the world is throwing money at by the Billions, had to get his permission?!?!?!?!. It can now alter your D&A from a swab, fine tuned by Bill Gates & Wife etc.

Netherlands has the most corrupt Royal Family, Great Britain second, so an easy place to establish this. Join Richard Rothschild's Friends, and annoy him.

Download • 271KB

United States

( 12 ) Patent Application Publication

Download PDF • 1.11MB

Atomic Bombshell_ Rothschilds Patented Covid-19 Biometric Tests in 2015 and 2017 - Stillness in the Storm-compressed.pdf They don’t want you to see news like this.

_3-Atomic Bombshell_ Rothschilds Patente
Download • 622KB



Download PDF • 290KB




Order in Council

The Governor in Council under section 55(2) of the Drugs, Poisons and Controlled

Substances Act 1981 restricts the sale or supply or use of the poison or controlled substance

Hydroxychloroquine in Victoria, in accordance with terms and conditions attached in the Schedule

to this Order, for a period of twelve weeks. This Order comes into effect on the date it is published

in the Government Gazette.

Dated 28 April 2020

Responsible Minister:


Minister for Health


Clerk of the Executive Council

Download PDF • 290KB


Practical Lawful Dissent International

To: Chief Constable, Chief Superintendant

Police HQ

From: Practical Lawful Dissent International




NOTICE TO COMPEL PERFORMANCE Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. Notice to principal is Notice to Agent

With regard to the previously served 'NOTICE OF OBLIGATION ACCORDING TO ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW', which evidently was received by your office a minimum of fourteen days previous to this 'NOTICE TO COMPEL PERFORMANCE' now being served, providing your office with a reasonable time frame for the neccesary investigation into the evidence and allegations of high treason provided therein to take place, we the people now compel you to perform according to English Constitutional law, and to clarify your lawful position to the Representatives of Practical Lawful Dissent International within Seven (7) days from the above date.

You need not be reminded that you have a 'duty of care' under Oath to perform according to law. We the people also have a moral and lawful duty to "compel" all others to defend the sovereignty of the Nation according to the famous security clause (Article. 61) of Magna Carta 1215 and, we hereby exercise this duty under duress at this time.

Essentially, all that is required from the police service is a); To acknowledgement of the TRUTH (evidenced facts provided) and b); To provide assurance in substance that you will perform according to law based on said facts without delay.

Make no mistake, we the people are numerous whilst this action is being observed, followed and supported by millions of people with growing interest and concern worldwide. We shall never surrender to tyranny.

Served under duress in peace and by lawful obligation, without malice nor ill will.

Sincererly. Representatives of Practical Lawful Dissent International.

Download DOCX • 15KB


recorded live #SAS2020 seminar and it’s a must see! Please watch and sign the petition against experimental vaccines. PLEASE WATCH.

The vaccine lowers your antibodies and makes you sicker when you do get the virus. All animals have died. Will they spread a worse virus after we’re all vaccinated? PLEASE WATCH ~ and sign the petition HERE


36 COVID-19 vaccine recipients develop rare blood disorder after getting Moderna, Pfizer shots



Christians defy COVID lions in Canada


1 in 10 Experience Serious Side Effects...Your "RIGHT" to Choose Natural Immunity & Not Wear a Mask? Shouldn't it be a right to choose the outcome of our own health? Shouldn't we be able to choose whether or not we intentionally want to be exposed in order the develop natural immunity? Wasn't the left chanting, "my body, my choice" for the last 5 decades? Let's examine the hypocrisy of mask mandates and the consensus before cv19 of the best way to become naturally immune to any virus.


The Mouth Cage

What Happens After the Mask

Handmaid's tale - This is war

Glastonbury Town Hall seized under article 61 Magna Carta invoked in 2001by 25 Barons

David Messenger

Magna Carta 1215 Article 61 cannot and is not denied to have been invoked on the 23rd March 2001. This provides US ALL with 'lawful excuse' to stop supporting the demise of Brtain and the commonwealth and the rule of law. This is the ONLY peaceful remedy we have against the peadophile, war mongerers in Westmonster!! Stand up for your rights or accept your enslavement without complaint. Its UP TO YOU. Peace


34 views0 comments
bottom of page