All content attributed to Vaccination News
The Archie Tapes - Uncut and Uncensored (2004) – Vaccination News The remarkable Dr. Archie Kalokerinos and I (Sandy Gottstein) years ago agreed that it was important to preserve his words for posterity once he was no longer able to speak them, and at long last they are posted here. My dear friends Bill Baker and Pamela Jennings donated their considerable video expertise and time for this interview. RIP, Archie. You are sorely missed. IMPORTANT NOTE TO WEBSITES: Vaccination News would appreciate being given proper attribution for these tapes if posted on your site. Our preference is also that you only link to The Archie Tapes on Vaccination News. However, AT A MINIMUM, we would appreciate links to the two pages (1,2) in addition to whatever formatting is done on your site, particularly given the not inconsiderable cost involved with making these wonderful tapes available to the public.
Vaccination News Subscribe toVaccination News youtube channels
Dr Archie Kalokerinos series of videos
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 1
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 2
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 3
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 4
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 5
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 6
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 7
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 8
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 9
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 10
Archivides "Archie" Kalokerinos interview, Part 11
Archie Kalokerinos talking on "Every Second Child" in New Zealand 1995
Archie Kalokerinos talking on "Every Second Child" in New Zealand 1995
All video series source at this link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdpKfgxXFsJjl-o85zK62KA
Dr Suzanne Humphries
Dr Archie was a medical doctor in Australia, whose heart lay heavy with the huge problems he saw in the Aboriginal community. His efforts to solve these problems both medically and politically earned him innumerable enemies both medically and politically and the resultant fallout plagued his career to the point where attorneys were heavily pressured never to defend him. To their credit, high positioned lawyers put their ethics above expediency, There was always someone willing to defend Dr Archie, despite the price they paid in their legal careers. For the whole of his life, what he saw and the way in which he was obstructed, weighed heavily on him because he knew that the medical issues he was discussing would apply worldwide and not just in Australia. He grieved that the medical system refused to see that his core work was the answer to so many problems were seeing. This remains true today. It could be said by some who knew him closely, that it was this that broke his heart and killed him in the end.
Every second child / [by] Archie Kalokerinos
BookAuthorKalokerinos, Archie
DescriptionMelbourne : Nelson, 1974
xiii,145p., 8p. of plates ; 24cm.
ISBN017001987X
Summary
Study on health patterns and problems of Aboriginal children based on the authors experiences as a medical practitioner at Collarenebri Aboriginal settlement, NSW; Relates his success in entirely eliminating infant death by the use of vitamin C and criticism of his theories on the causes and treatment of Aboriginal health problems by his colleagues; Many case histories of disease cure through the use of vitamin C given Diseases and health problems discussed; upper respiratory tract infections, gastroentritis, malnutrition (3 types), pneumonia/bronchospasm, anaemia, parasite infections, otitis media (abscess formation in the ear), running noses, faulty immune; reactions, malabsorption, vitamin deficiencies, dangers of oral antibiotics, viral v. bacterial infections (gastroenteritis), poor living conditions (dirt floors, dusty out door areas), and respiratory infections, breast v. bottle feeding in the; development of antibody protection, use 7 Sunshine milk, dangers of immunisation programmes, disturbances to the gastro-intestinal andmucous membranes, diarrhoea, zinc deficiency caused by genetic fault associated with the inability to defoxify; alcohol leading to alcoholism, the enzyme alpha antitripsin and genetic factors in Aboriginal health patterns, Vitamin c (scurvy, symptons of deficiency, utilisation by the body during teething, infection, immunisation and in the presence of antibiotics, deficiency as a cause of sudden unexpected infant death), infant disease patterns, need for health education programmes and misunderstanding of Aboriginal health problems by doctors; Also discusses B.C.G. vaccine against T.B., tests for detecting sodium, potassium and hemoglobin levels in the blood and vitamin C in urine, the R or transferable drug resistance factor, trial of Nancy Young from Cunnamulla for criminal neglect leading to the death of her child, Aboriginal attitude toward twins and associated infanticide, overview of Aboriginal adult health problems including coronary occlusions, strokes, blindness, diabetes, trachoma, Labrador Keratitis.
Notes
Index.
Bibliography: p.139-141.
Every Second Child
a book by Dr Archie Kalokerinos ISBN 0879832509.
"One research worker in the laboratory had been immunizing animals against diseases like tetanus and Diptheria. His experience showed that after being immunized, some of the animals died suddenly within 24 hours. These deaths had been attributed to anaphylaxis. Authorities the world over had decided that this was so (it is a severe allergic reaction). I suggested that vitamin C deficiency was the cause. The animals involved did not make their own. Like primates they required it in their diet. To discover the truth only required a simple experiment..... The result was definite, unquestionable and final. Half of a group of animals were supplemented with vitamin C before being immunised. None died. The un-supplemented half continued to die at rates equal to those found in previous experiments. The importance of this discovery can hardly be stressed. In Australia and all over the world, infants were being immunised. Those whose vitamin C status was low were at risk. here, at last, was experimental evidence that supported my claims that stepping up immunisation campaigns among Aboriginal infants increased the death rate." (p.139-140)
Articles
He loved the Collarenebri Aborigines as though they were his own.
The astonishing death rate had him up at all hours of day and night trying to figure out what was killing them.
Interview---- International Vaccine NewsletterJune 1995
Kris Gaublomme MD
The Children’s Vaccine Initiative
An open window upon global vaccination strategies
Kris Gaublomme, MD. (The International Vaccination Newsletter, June 1998)
The first CVI Strategic Plan was prepared in 1992-1993.
Most participants of CVI are associated with national or international health organisations or scientific research institutes. From a distance it looks like those people can claim intellectual immunity and commercial virginity. But what about official representatives of pharmaceutical firms directly involved with vaccine production, such as SmithKline Beecham, Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, and Merck? Is there any reason to believe they could possibly be neutral in designing a strategic plan? There certainly is not. http://whale.to/vaccines/gaublomme.html
TETANUS TOXOID VACCINATION
An overview by Kris Gaublomme, MD
Polio: the roots of the story
Flu Vaccine
Influenza is a specific syndrome, provoked by a specific viral agent, the influenza virus. The symptoms may be severe, or even lead to exitus in people with a weakened general condition.
Two main families have been detected, influenza A and B. But there are many strains of influenza viruses, and, moreover, existing strains mutate all the time. It is, therefore, an extremely difficult task to 'foresee' the causative agent of a new influenza epidemic, and even more difficult to produce a corresponding vaccine in time. The constant mutation of the viruses, and the unpredictability of which virus will show up where and when, makes the whole influenza vaccination business into a giant poker game.
The most intriguing deception of the public, however, is the suggestion that the patient who gets an influenza-vaccination will not get the flu. What is generally known to the public as 'a flu' is an influenza-like syndrome, with symptoms like fever, chills, muskel- or joint pains, a headache, a runny nose, and general malaise. This disease, however, has got nothing to do with the real influenza, neither can it in any way be prevented by an influenza vaccination. Thus, if doctors guarantee their patients that they will not get the flu after they came in to get their jab, this is an unethical manipulation, the basis for which most probably is simply profit for both those who produce the vaccine and those who administer it.
Apart from this manipulation, questions have to be answered as to the efficacy and the safety of the vaccine.
Acellular pertussis---
Hepatitis-B vaccination in newborns Kris Gaublomme, MD
SEVERE VACCINATION DAMAGE AND ITS HOMEOPATHIC CURE
Dr.-lng Joachim-F. Grätz, homeopath. International Vaccination Newsletter Dec 1995
WHALE home page for vaccination documents (books, articles, media stories, quotes, citations,videos, memes, ingredients, contaminants, package inserts,VAERS, also critics& mind control), exposing vaccination, collected over 20 years.
MMR legal funding
[One way to suppress the MMR autism link is to withdraw Gov' funding, others are covered at Vaccine autism proven. Sir Nigel Davis, brother of Sir Crispin Davis: non-executive director of GSK, was the man who cut off the funding. Similar GSK connections with Murdoch (2009 James Murdoch was appointed a non executive director with Glaxo SmithKline the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine), whose main newspaper, the Times & journo Deer, others here: The Greek Chorus) attacking Dr. Andy Wakefield.]
Lawyer list of claims: Autism (287), Crohn’s disease and other serious chronic stomach problems (136), Epilepsy (132), Other forms of brain damage (induding meningitis, cerebral palsy, encephalopathy, encephalitis etc.) (77), Hearing and vision problems (81), Arthritis (50), Behavioural and learning problems (in older children) (110), Chronic fatigue syndrome (41), Diabetes (15), Guillain-Barre syndrome (9), Idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura (and other purpuras) (6), Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis (SSPE) (3), Wegener’s Granulamatosis (2), Leukaemia (1), Multiple sclerosis (1), Death (18). (Dawbarns fact sheet.)
[Oct 2007] MMR LEGAL AID the high court judge states categorically that he was not aware at the time that his brother, Sir Crispin davis, was a non-executive director of GSK, one of three defendant drug companies in the MMR controversy. But when the Eye and others asked his office about a potential conflict five months ago, a statement was issued on his behalf which said: "In 2003, Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a non-executive director of GSK. At the date of the hearing before Mr Justice (February 2004), the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's position was not raised with him and did not occur to him. If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought in the court of appeal."
[May 2007] MMR judge faces probe over brother's link to vaccine firm [May 2007] MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR AND LANCET BOSS Judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who had dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation by the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO Reed Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also recently become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline.
[Media Feb 2004] Payout scandal of children left disabled by jabs [MMR litigation] A life sentence with no appeal; It's the final insult. [Media 27 February, 2004] Parents refused aid to fight MMR
Without Prejudice
ANDREW WAKEFIELD IN THE DOCK
September 2008
Louise Mclean spoke to Martin J. Walker in late August about the GMC trial of Dr Andrew Wakefield. The hearing has already lasted for more than a year and is not scheduled to finish until April 2009.
From 1992, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a gastroenterologist working in the research unit of the Royal Free Hospital in London, had a number of children with inflammatory bowel disease and regressive autism referred to him. The parents claimed the symptoms had developed after their children received the MMR vaccine. He and his team, Professor Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch, who are also being tried by the GMC, investigated the cause of the bowel disease with the full support of the hospital and in 1998 along with other researchers and psychologists published a case series review study in the Lancet.
This study and a concommitent press briefing were attacked. Once that review was published in February 1998 and after a press briefing when Andrew Wakefield stated it might be better to use single vaccines, until a conclusion about research at the Royal Free had been reached, the pharmaceutical industry wanted any criticism stopped immediately.
Dr. Wakefield especially was vilified, research funding grants were withdrawn and his contract at the Royal Free not renewed, forcing him to leave the UK. In 2002 he set up a practice in the US with other researchers to continue his work and is now the executive director of research at Thoughtful House, a non-profit-making school and clinic in Austin, Texas, which treats children with autism from all over the world.
Dr. Wakefield published a rebuttal to the attacks Testimony of Dr Andrew J Wakefield MB MS FRCS FRCPath and you can read more on Dr. Wakefield on the Cry Shame http://www.cryshame.net/ and Whale sites. http://www.whale.to/vaccines/wakefield.html
This trial sends out a clear message to doctors that under no circumstances must the safety of vaccines be questioned, yet the clamour is getting louder, as the autism figures continue to rise.
Video transcripts: Dr Andrew Wakefield - In His own words
2010 April by Alan Golding
Dr Andrew Wakefield on HPV and H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines Dr Andrew Wakefield talks about New Vaccines, HPV and the H1 N1 Vaccines. He mentions correspondence with Dr David Salisbury, director of immunization and now Chairman of WHOs SAGE committee and who also heads the WHO H1N1 Advisory Group [Transcript] Since 1992 I was in correspondence, albeit intermittently, with David Salisbury and the Department of Health trying to prevail upon them then that we did not have any answers, that we had a series of questions generated by our own observations, and by parental reports that gave us cause for concern about the safety of the measles containing vaccines, and it was a very unsatisfactory relationship in as much that despite my repeated entreaties to Dr Salisbury there was very little response in return of any substance, in fact it took him 2 years to be forced into a position to respond and meet with me after my first letter to him.
Now I come to the second part of your question which was about the introduction of two new vaccines in the recent past and that is the cervical cancer vaccine against Human Papilloma virus and the Swine Flu vaccine, and I have grave misgivings about these as does the very doctor who was part of the senior team to oversee the development of the cervical cancer vaccine in the United States. I have just been in a meeting with her where she has expressed major reservations about the commercial way in which the campaign to force this vaccine into American children has been conducted, and there are increasing reports of safety concerns with this vaccine. Now, I ahve no experience with this vaccine, I have no detailed knowledge of it at all but if it is rushed to commercialisation, rushed to licensing with anything like we have heard then we have every reason to be concerned.
My concern about the swine flu vaccine in this country is that it intends to reintroduce a substance that was eliminated some years ago and that is Thimerosal, the mercury preservative. There is no safe level of Thimerosal, and there is most certainly no safe level to be given in an untested fashion to pregnant women or to infants, so why in heavens name is this now being reintroduced?
And the other concern with the vaccines to be used in this country is the presence of Squalene, a substance, an oily substance that is used to boost the immune response, what is called an adjuvant, and again there have been major concerns about the safety of this adjuvant, as it was used in the Anthrax vaccine in the Gulf War, and despite continuous denial that Gulf War Syndrome was an entity in soldiers, it has now becoming increasingly accepted, broadly accepted, that GWS is real and that it is related to the vaccines and other toxins that the soldiers were given. more @ http://whale.to/vaccine/wakefield23.html
NORE READING
THE OTHERSIDE OF VACCINES
Compulsory Vaccination: History Repeating? (Part 1: England) Regardless of your own personal beliefs regarding vaccination, the idea that a government can mandate a medical procedure without your consent, should be cause for concern to everyone (in addition, it contravenes basic human rights principles, in regards to informed consent, which must be freely given, “without coercion, undue influence or misrepresentation”) [1].
As we see governments around the world moving ever closer to forced vaccination, it behoves us to take a leaf from history, and remember what happens when the State assumes ownership of a person’s physical body.
The truth is that compulsory vaccination is not a new concept. It’s been tried before! In Part 1, we will take a closer look at how it worked out for England, with compulsory smallpox vaccination.
It began innocently enough, with the British Vaccination Act (1840).
Under this law, free vaccination was provided to the poor, to be administered by the Poor Law Guardians (while the original practice of ‘inoculation’ was outlawed). Many ‘poor and uneducated’, though, shunned the offer of free vaccination [2].
Thirteen years later, compulsory vaccination was introduced – despite evidence that smallpox mortality had been declining for many decades [3].
Compulsory Vaccination Act (1853)
This law required all babies up to the 3mths old (or, 4mths in the case of orphans) to be vaccinated. Parents who refused to comply faced fines of £1 (the equivalent of approximately one week’s wages for a skilled tradesman, and todays equivalent of approximately £80), or imprisonment.
Comments