NEW ZEALAND
Covid 19 Coronavirus: Govt Makes Urgent Law Change After High Court Ruling On Legality Of Vaccine Rollout
The Health Minister is making an urgent law change after a High Court judgment ruled it was "reasonably arguable" the Government's provisional approval of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is "problematic".
The case - Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Medical Action Society Incorporated v The Minister of Health - was in the High Court at Wellington last week.
In a decision released on Tuesday, Judge Rebecca Ellis said: "it is reasonably arguable that the decision to provisionally approve the vaccine for much wider use is problematic" and went beyond the powers of section 23 of the Medicines Act.
Covid 19 coronavirus: Govt makes urgent law change after High Court ruling on legality of vaccine rollout - NZ Herald
'The law has for some time now, lacked clarity.'
Vaccine_Court Documents
Documents pertaining to the Vaccine court action against the government.
VaxChallenge: Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Medical Action Society Incorporated v The Minister of Health – Court Decision
https://kti.org.nz/?p=509
SHARE LINK
Stroke/Death following Comirnaty vaccine in elderly care facility
A decree was made two days ago, to take effect from tomorrow night. Broadly, it sets up a set of sanctions to affect those who resist vaccination in particular workplaces. There is a context, to which I wish to draw attention...go to link in title
Letter by NZ Doctors with Concerns Over Pfizer Vaccine
COVID PCR Test Swabs Are As Dangerous As Inhaling Asbestos
An experimental physicist and bio-materials researcher examined various PCR test swabs under a microscope and found that the fibres they contain are as dangerous for human beings as inhaling asbestos.
picture slideshow
New post on Cairns News
Letter to the Editor I had COVID for one day on June 26, 2020. My doctor prescribed Hydroxycholoroquine, Zinc, Vitamin D3, Chlorella, Collagen, Damiana Leaf Extract, and Astralagus, and I tested NEGATIVE within 24 hours. But my doctor was actually sane. On the other hand, the Lethal Injection results in the following adverse events: 1. Known injury and deaths from Messenger RNA prions, which in the case of cattle, results in “Mad Cow Disease,” and in the case of human beings, results in the manifestation of brain dysfunction and hysteria; 2. Known injury and death from anaphylactic shock resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine; 3. Known injury and death from toxic lung, heart, and brain paralysis resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine; 4. Known injury and death from toxic blood clotting resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine; and: 5. Known injury and death from toxemia arising from infertility complications resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine. 6. Known injury and death from mitochondrial cancer from lipid nanoparticles causing cytokine storms of spike proteins which deprive the heart, lungs, and brain of oxygen. 7. A phenomenon known as Frequency Transmissibility Shedding caused by 5G Electromagnetic Transmission Nanoparticles which cause UNVACCINATED people to be harmed if they are in direct proximity with VACCINATED people; and: 8. THERE IS NO CURE for the Experimental Use Authorization Injection. 80% will die within the first five years, and 100% will all die within ten years, due to the replication and proliferation of oxygen-depriving spike proteins. So what choice makes more sense for your survival, I ask respectfully? from Steven Fishman Queensland
The Monstrous Virus Hoax: The Scam that Made the Grade! ...by T.C. Fry
READ FULL - download
VIRUS HOAX - EXPLAINED
PAWNS IN THE GLOBALISTS GAME
SAUDI ARABIA
They have decided to make vaccine mandatory!
They have a health app already which they’re working on integrating with IATA.
Saudigazette (https://saudigazette.com.sa/article/606393/SAUDI-ARABIA/Coronavirus-vaccines-mandatory-for-all-employees-to-attend-workplace)
Coronavirus vaccines mandatory for all employees to attend workplace
PCR Test_ It doesn't tell you that you're sick ____________
Karry Mullis - inventor of the PCR test - Noble Prize Winner
COVID-19: A realistic approach to community management
recommend reading the full white paper - download pdf
SOME EXTRACTS FROM THE PDF ARTICLE in no sequential order
PLEASE READ FULL WHITE PAPER
Why mass vaccinaton amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster
read full artiicle
FULL ARTICLE
Read full Dossier
COVID-19 Anti-Trust Argument
Some of this information was submitted to the Office of the Inspector General for the United States Department of Health and Human Services on April 22, 2020 Request for Investigation - Possible Sherman Act Violation Citizens of the United States of America
read here
Submitted this 22nd of April, 2020
Dr. David E. Martin – all Whistleblower Rights and Protections Reserved
````````````````````````````````````````````
Citizens of the United States of America
United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Robert R Redfield, et al.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Anthony Stephen Fauci, et al.
This is what came up for DC.
Notes for Monday, April 27, 2020
Laws that You Need to Know
(Creative Commons License – Reference) David E. Martin 2020
U.S. Constitution: Article One, Section 8, clause 8, To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries
Article One, Section 9, clause 2, which states that "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus (a recourse in law challenging the reasons or conditions of a person's confinement) shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.
The Sherman Act: 15 U.S. Code § 1. Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
The Clayton Act: 15 U.S. Code §2 Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty: Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $10,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $350,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
15 U.S. Code § 19 Interlocking directorates and officers: (a)(1) No person shall, at the same time, serve as a director or officer in any two corporations (other than banks, banking associations, and trust companies) that are— (A) engaged in whole or in part in commerce; and (B) by virtue of their business and location of operation, competitors, so that the elimination of competition by agreement between them would constitute a violation of any of the antitrust law.
On April 25, 2003, the United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (hereinafter, “CDC”) filed an application for a United States (Application Number US46592703P, subsequently issued as U.S. Patent 7,776,521) entitled “Coronavirus isolated from humans”. Claim 3 –A method of detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample…; and, Claim 4 - A kit for detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample…, provided the CDC with a statutory market exclusion right the detection of and sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Securing this right afforded the CDC exclusive right to research, commercially exploit, or block others from conducting activities involving SARS-CoV since 2003. On September 24,
2018, the CDC failed to pay the required maintenance fees on this patent and their rights expired with no notification issued by CDC alerting the private sector to this decision
From April 2003 until September 2018, the CDC owned SARS-CoV, its ability to be detected and the ability to manufacture kits for its assessment. During this 15-year period, the effect of the grant of this right – ruled unconstitutional in 2013 by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics – meant that the commercial exploitation of any research or commercial activity in the United States involving SARS-CoV would constitute an infringement of CDC’s illegal patent.
It appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal, the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases led by Anthony Fauci (hereinafter “NIAID” and "Dr Fauci", respectively) entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with Ecohealth Alliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights.
It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (hereinafter “NIAID”) entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Shi) et al. 2015-2016
It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations to conduct chimeric construction of novel coronavirus material with specific virulence properties prior to, during, and following the determination made by the National Institutes for Health in October 17, 2014 that this work was not sufficiently understood for its biosecurity and safety standards.
In this inquiry, it is presumed that the CDC and its associates were: a) fully aware of the work being performed using their patented technology; b) entered into explicit or implicit agreements including licensing, or other consideration; and, c) willfully engaged one or more foreign interests to carry forward the exploitation of their proprietary technology when the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that such patents were illegal and when the National Institutes of Health issued a moratorium on such research
Reportedly, in January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in China sent investigators to Wuhan Institute of Virology and found that, “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.” The Washington Post reported that this information was contained in a cable dated 19 January 2018. Over a year later, in June 2019, the CDC conducted an inspection of Fort Detrick’s U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (hereinafter “USAMRIID”) and ordered it closed after alleging that their inspection found biosafety hazards. A report in the journal Nature in 2003 (423(6936): 103) reported cooperation between CDC and USAMRIID on coronavirus research followed by considerable subsequent collaboration. The CDC, for what appear to be the same type of concern identified in Wuhan, elected to continue work with the Chinese government while closing the U.S. Army facility.
(Creative Commons License – Reference) David E. Martin 2020 page 2
read more
SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE DISHONORABLE RECORD OF DR. FAUCI – A REAL MENGELE
By F. William Engdahl Shedding Light on the Dishonorable Record of Dr. Fauci – A Real Mengele | Madison Area Lyme Support Group
The following article is a “Must Read” as it points out what the Lyme community knows all too well: The CDC can not be trusted. History shows it has severe conflicts of interests by owning licenses and patents that directly interfere with testing and diagnosis of numerous diseases – including COVID-19 & Lyme.
By the end of this first article and episode, the public will understand that
WHO Offered the US a Perfectly Good, Validated Test
CDC Refused, Wanting “Their Own”
This is Not the First Time CDC Wanted to Corner the Testing Market
HHS Whistleblower Chris Meekin Says CDC Lied to President Trump About the CDC’s Testing Abilities
Due to Capacity Alone, CDC is Incapable of Mounting an Effective Response to Outbreaks (Obvious National Security Issue)
Delay in Accurate Testing Could Help CDC – But It May Have Cost Us Everything
In 2019 Fauci and NIAID got $100 million from the Gates Foundation for developing “gene based” therapies for HIV and sickle cell disease. Fauci was named 1 of the 5 Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation Global Vaccine Action Plan.
No one has isolated and purified samples of patients tested SARS-CoV-2 positive for COVID-19. No electron microscope analysis exists.
Fauci circumvented the moratorium on coronavirus research (broke the law) and outsourced it to China, using millions of taxpayer money: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/14/wuhan-lab-got-3-7-million-from-u-s-government/
Presidential Documents
Executive Order 13924 of May 19, 2020
Regulatory Relief To Support Economic Recovery
Presidential Documents
Executive Order 13922 of May 14, 2020
Delegating Authority Under the Defense Production Act to
the Chief Executive Officer of the United States International
Development Finance Corporation To Respond to the COVID–
19 Outbreak
Italy opens manslaughter case after teacher dies hours after getting AstraZeneca vaccine
Ivermectin and the Virus
by David Archibald 25 December 2020
The efficacy of a drug has not been proven until the journal Nature has run a hit piece attacking it. For ivermectin, that was on 20 October, 2020. So many people in South America are using ivermectin now that it is hard to recruit people for clinical trials on the virus. Ivermectin was discovered in the late 1970s, in a program that tested thousands of soil samples around Japan. A sample from a golf course produced a molecule called avermectin, of which ivermectin is a synthetic derivative. It was approved for human use by the FDA in 1987, and has cured hundreds of millions of people from parasitic worm infections. It is also used to treat worms in farm animals, dogs and cats. Ivermectin is quite benign, with an 18 hour half-life in the body and a wide therapeutic window. In April this year, a research group at Monash University found that ivermectin inhibited the Wuhan virus in vitro. So doctors in many parts of the world, for the want of anything at all to treat their patients, started using it — with good results. A recent clinical trial of ivermectin in the Argentinian hospital system produced spectacular results.
Comments