Parliament is NOT sovereign we the people ARE. When Parliament is dissolved (who holds the power) Sovereignty is returned to the people and Her Majesty.
“Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived”
WARNINGS are a Blessing:
Revelation 1:3: "Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy,
and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near."(NASB)
A Law above the Law: Christian Roots of the English Common Law
The article explains why Christianity has always been an important element of the common law, and why the Christian foundations of the common law should not be ignored or neglected.
Augusto Zimmermann
Augusto Zimmermann teaches at Western Australia’s Murdoch University School of
Law, where he currently is Senior Lecturer in Law as well as Associate Dean for
Research and Director of Postgraduate Studies.
Extract
Magna Carta
of 1215, a charter which guaranteed the basic
rights and privileges to the English barons
against the king.
Professor Aroney explains Christianity’s ideological influence upon
the Magna Carta:
From [the time of Alfred] the kings of England have traditionally recognised
their submission to God. At their coronations they take an oath before the
Archbishop acknowledging the Law of God as the standard of justice, and
the rights of the church. They a re also urged to do justice under God and
to govern God’s people fairly. Magna Carta was a development of these
themes.
see; MAGNA CARTA
MEMO TO PRESIDENT TRUMP
Time To End the Special Relationship; Declassify All British-Spawned Documents Concerning Your 2016 Campaign
by Barbara Boyd
WHAT YOU CAN DO
Read
VERY IMFORMATIVE WEBSITES
URGENT! Did You Know that ? Political Parties created their own Private Australia, Commonwealth, Commonwealth of Australia as a Republic
read here:
Australian Government Treasury freedom of information page. Documents relating to registration with the SEC of the Australian Government as a privately owned American company.
Queensland a law unto itself.
Unicameral means "one-chambered", and the term almost always describes a governing body. Our federal legislature, like those of most democracies, is bicameral, with two legislative (lawmaking) bodies—the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Every country in the world has some form of representative government, and parliamentary systems fall into two categories: bicameral - with two chambers of parliament - and unicameral - with one chamber.
Under a parliamentary unicameral system, one who controls the ruling party also controls the government; thus, there are no checks and balances.
Australian Constitution - Section 109 - Inconsistency of laws
When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Australian Constitution - Section 114 - States may not raise forces - Taxation of property of Commonwealth or State
A State shall not, without the consent of the Parliament of the Commonwealth, raise or maintain any naval or military force, or impose any tax on property of any kind belonging to the Commonwealth, nor shall the Commonwealth impose any tax on property of any kind belonging to a State.
Australian Constitution - Section 117 - Rights of residents in States
A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.
Australian Constitution - Section 119 - Protection of States from invasion and violence
The Commonwealth shall protect every State against invasion and, on the application of the Executive Government of the State, against domestic violence.
Australian Constitution - Section 123 - Alteration of limits of States
The Parliament of the Commonwealth may, with the consent of the Parliament of a State, and the approval of the majority of the electors of the State voting upon the question, increase, diminish, or otherwise alter the limits of the State, upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed on, and may, with the like consent, make provision respecting the effect and operation of any increase or diminution or alteration of territory in relation to any State affected.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 128
Mode of altering the Constitution [see Note 1]
MUST READ
FOI REQUESTI N ACCORDANCE WITH THE Freedom of Information Act 1982 Brett Wilson made this Right to Information request to
Coverinng Clause 5 states the following:
Shall be Binding on the Courts, Judges and People. The importance of these words, as indicating one of the fundamental principles of the Constitution, should be specially noted. Under this clause, the Act, the Constitution, and laws of the Commonwealth made in pursuance of its powers, will be the supreme law of the land, binding on the Courts, Judges, and people of every State, despite anything to the contrary in the laws of any State. The latter words operate as a rescission of all State laws incompatible with the Act, with the Constitution, and with such laws as may be passed by the Parliament of the Commonwealth in the exercise of its Constitutional rights. Therefore, by this clause, coupled with sections 106, 107, 108 and 109, all the laws of a State, constitutional as well as ordinary, will be in effect repealed so far as they are repugnant to the supreme law being the Commonwealth Constitution. All the laws of any State, that includes QLD, so far as not inconsistent with the supreme law (Commonwealth Constitution), will remain in force until altered by the proper authority.
The QLD Parliament also ignored established English legal principles, where two houses of parliament are required to pass Bills into law. The Commonwealth Constitution does not allow for a unicameral parliament and QLD creating one, is a breach of the rule of law and blatant disrespect for English legal principles.
Brett Wilson left an annotation (November 07, 2019)
Some notes on the Councils response: Brett Wilson left an annotation (November 07, 2019) 1. The FOI requester acted on a newspaper article regarding the Gold Coast City Council (GCCC) allegedly investigating the possibility of using facial recognition cameras to track people including their movements and possible spending habits whilst visiting the Gold Coast. The FOI requester believes that a Municipal Authority like GCCC has no reasonable cause to employ these cameras at rate payer’s expense, it would be done beyond their power and would violate the privacy rights and sovereignty of individuals, being targeted by such Orwellian like invasive technology. Employing such technology does not relate to the services and functions GCCC might provide its rate payers as a Municipal Authority or Body Corporate. 2. GCCC makes the claim that their interpretation of the legitimacy of the system of local government they operate under is unquestionable of which remains in dispute by the FOI requester and many Constitutional law researchers and experts due to reckless Unconstitutional and unlawful behavior, we alleged has been carried out previously by mostly the two major political parties. To fully understand the unconstitutional effect on Queensland, of the requests by Members of Political Parties, each under their own parties constitution and policies, sitting in the respective purported Parliaments and Governments “of Australia”. One needs to first look back into Queensland’s Constitutional history in particular, Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 [31 Vic. No.38] as amended to 5th April 1977. Of which GCCC Legal Services references several times in its FOI response. The Conferences held on 24th June 1982, 25th June 1982, and 21st June 1984, resulted in a Prime Minister and six Premiers agreeing “on the taking of certain measures to bring constitutional arrangements affecting the Commonwealth and the States into conformity with the status of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation” Note: Oxford Dictionary:- “ conformity n. compliance with conventions, rules or laws ” “ status n. the official classification given to a person, country, etc. ” However, the words “Prime Minister” and “Premier” do NOT appear anywhere in Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 [31Vic. No.38] as amended to 5th April 1977, and NOT in the Founding and Primary “Law of the Commonwealth of Australia”, the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, as Proclaimed and Gazetted, consisting of its Preamble, Clauses 1 to 9 and the Schedule. The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985, (QLD) No. 69 of 16th October 1985 is contra to Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 [31Vic. No.38] as amended to 5th April 1977 and is contra to the Founding and Primary “Law of the Commonwealth of Australia”, the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, as Proclaimed and Gazetted, consisting of its Preamble, Clauses 1 to 9 and the Schedule The Constitutional “Australia” and “The Commonwealth” were defined in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, Act No. 2 given Royal Assent on 12th July 1901:- Constitutional and official definitions 17. In any Act, unless the contrary intention appears— (a) “The Commonwealth” shall mean the Commonwealth of Australia (b) “Australia” includes the whole of the Commonwealth Refer: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C... 3. GCCC Legal Services mentioned the fact that The Legislative Council was abolished by legislation in 1922 however, the FOI requester alleges this was an action done beyond the power of the QLD State Parliament at that time “Ultra Vires” void and is of no effect. It is repugnant to Sect 128 of the Commonwealth Constitution, a law which prevails over all State Constitutions, applies to the Sate of QLD now and as it did in 1922 to its Parliament and Ministers who were in direct breach of Covering Clause 5 of the Commonwealth Constitution at that time and are now, for not upholding its laws i.e. Sect 128 in this case. Coverinng Clause 5 states the following: Shall be Binding on the Courts, Judges and People. The importance of these words, as indicating one of the fundamental principles of the Constitution, should be specially noted. Under this clause, the Act, the Constitution, and laws of the Commonwealth made in pursuance of its powers, will be the supreme law of the land, binding on the Courts, Judges, and people of every State, despite anything to the contrary in the laws of any State. The latter words operate as a rescission of all State laws incompatible with the Act, with the Constitution, and with such laws as may be passed by the Parliament of the Commonwealth in the exercise of its Constitutional rights. Therefore, by this clause, coupled with sections 106, 107, 108 and 109, all the laws of a State, constitutional as well as ordinary, will be in effect repealed so far as they are repugnant to the supreme law being the Commonwealth Constitution. All the laws of any State, that includes QLD, so far as not inconsistent with the supreme law (Commonwealth Constitution), will remain in force until altered by the proper authority. The QLD Parliament also ignored established English legal principles, where two houses of parliament are required to pass Bills into law. The Commonwealth Constitution does not allow for a unicameral parliament and QLD creating one, is a breach of the rule of law and blatant disrespect for English legal principles. Copies of the sealed and signed pages, as well as a copy of the text of the Constitution Act Amendment Act 1922 [12 Geo. V.] [No. 32] which abolished the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Queensland, despite the people of Queensland having voted NO in the Referendum held in 1917,
can be found at:- http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item-sdid...
http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources... The Constitution of Queensland 2001, No. 80 of 3rd December 2001, with its Schedule 2, made Amendments to the Constitution Act 1867, but had NO Crown and Constitutional authority to do so, and had NO consent of the people of Queensland to do so under the people’s Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867 [31 Vic. No.38] as amended to 5th April 1977, at Section 53, inserted under Crown and Constitutional authority with Section 7 of Queensland’s Constitution Act Amendment Act 1977, No. 9 of 5th April 1977. The Legitimacy of Local Government is unquestionable claims the GCCC Legal Services? The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth. Sir John Quick LL.D. and Sir Robert Randolph Garran, M.A. Quote: “Section 107: RESIDUARY LEGISLATIVE POWERS. The residuary authority left to the Parliament of each State, after the exclusive and concurrent grants to the Federal Parliament, embraces a large mass of constitutional, territorial, municipal, and social powers, including control over: Agriculture and the cultivation of the soil: Banking — State banking within the limits of the State: Borrowing money on the sole credit of the State: Bounties and aids on mining for gold, silver, or metals: Charities—establishment and management of asylums: Constitution of State: amendment, maintenance and execution of Corporations—other than foreign corporations and trading or financial corporations: Courts—civil and criminal, maintenance and organization for the execution of the laws of a State: Departments of State Governments — regulation of Education Factories Fisheries within the State: Forests Friendly Societies Game Health, Inspection of goods imported or proposed to be exported in order to detect fraud or prevent the spread of disease: Insurance — State Insurance within the limits of the State: Intoxicants—the regulation and prohibition of the manufacture within the State of fermented, distilled, or intoxicating liquids: Justice—Courts: Land—management and sale of public lands within the State: Licenses—the regulation of the issue of licenses to conduct trade and industrial operations, within the State, such as liquor licenses and auctioneers’ licenses. Manufactures—see factories: Mines and Mining: Municipal institutions and local government: Officers—appointment and payment of public officers of the State: Police — regulations, social and sanitary: Prisons—State prisons and reformatories: Railways—control and construction of railways within the State, subject to constitutional limitations (see Restricted Powers): Rivers—subject to constitutional limitations (see Restricted Powers): Shops—subject to constitutional limitations (see Restricted Powers): Taxation on order to the raising of revenue for State purposes (see Restricted Powers): Trade and Commerce within the State (see Restricted Powers): Works—construction and promotion of public works and internal improvements, subject to the constitutional limitations (see Restricted Powers):” Unquote Comment: As outlined above, municipal institutions and local government can only be a department of a State and any other description is a breach of the Commonwealth Constitution section 107. Any Act passed by any Parliament or a local law passed by a Municipal Authority is ultra vires, not lawfully enforceable if in contradiction inconsistent or repugnant to the Commonwealth Constitution. Any Act that is in contradiction with the Commonwealth Constitution is not valid and is unlawful and the people of Queensland are entitled to disregard it. Authority’s for the above statement: 1. The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth. Sir John Quick LL.D. and Sir Robert Randolph Garran, M.A. Quote: “Not all enactments purporting to be laws made by the Parliament are binding; but laws made under, in pursuance of, and within the authority conferred by the Constitution, and those only, are binding on the courts, judges, and people. A law in excess of the authority conferred by the Constitution is no law; it is wholly void and inoperative; it confers no rights, it imposes no duties; it affords no protection” (Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 10th May 1886). 2. Former Chief Justice Latham’s made the comments in a High Court decision; South Australia v The Commonwealth 1942 (Uniform Tax Case) former Chief Justice Latham’s comments: Quote: “If either the Commonwealth Parliament or a State Parliament attempts to make a law which is not within its powers, the attempt fails, because the alleged law is unauthorized and is not a law at all”. “The courts have declared a statute invalid, sometimes lead to misunderstanding. A pretended law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to disregard it”. Local government is not a third independent level of government in Australia; it is a sublevel of government of state government”. “Our Constitution is a dual system. It has two levels of government—a federal government and a state government”. It DOES NOT allow for three levels of government of which GCCC falsely claims and misleads the public to be a third level of government on its web site. Professor Anne Towmey made comments during the joint select expert hearing on the recognition of local government on Wednesday the16 of January 2013: Professor Anne Twomey comments where as follows: Quote: “One of the reasons that is sometimes stated is that local government is a third level of government in Australia and it should be recognised in the Constitution. This, I think, is a bit of a misleading argument. Technically, local government is not a third independent level of government in Australia; it is a sublevel of government of state government”. “Our Constitution is a dual system. It has two levels of government—a federal government and a state government”. Unquote. State Governments by means of Section 108 of the Commonwealth Constitution have the power to make laws for their respective State, but they do not have the power to make laws outside of their authority or to create or authorise any other body or organisation to make laws (Local Laws) or to become a third or an essential tier of government or any other form of government.
Download Full FOIRequest and Response
Zip File
Letters Patent
Relating to the Office of Governor‑General of the Commonwealth of Australia
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
We reserve full power from time to time to revoke, alter or amend these Letters Patent as We think fit. GIVEN at Our Court at Balmoral on 21 August 1984 By Her Majesty's Command, BOB HAWKE Prime Minister
Political Parties - Changing Our Commonwealth Of Australia Constitution - without the peoples Knowledge NO Referendum
Amendment of Letters Patent
Passed under the Royal Sign Manual and the Great Seal of Australia
Given at Our Court
at Windsor
on 11 May 2003
By Her Majesty’s Command,
JOHN HOWARD
Prime Minister
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION
Commonwealth of Australia Numbered Acts data base contains copies of Commonwealth of Australia Numbered Acts from 1901 to Database last updated: 4 January 2021
what-the-FUQ-Scott-Bartle-Part1
Scott Bartle discusses OPPT
Comments